THE REASON WHY THERE IS NO AUDI A6 IS BECAUSE LINCOLN KNEW AUDI WOULD BEAT THAT UGLY ASS LINCOLN. EVEN IF THE LINCOLN IS THE FASTEST AND MOST FUEL EFFICIENT, I WOULD CHOOSE AUDI, MB, OR BMW OVER IT ANYDAY.

These videos don't really prove much to me.   Based on the MKS's numbers it looks like a Taurus SHO could beat the MKS and all other cars shown here, so what.  Lincoln needs a car that is great inside and out.   The performance of the ecoboost engine and all the other nice technological features are good, but what about the rest of this vehicle.  Cheap interior parts, generic looks.  The ass end of this car is so high up you can see the  " y" of the dual exhaust pipes (not the exhuast tips) underneath the car as you approach the MKS.   Even the name of this car is bad, why not resurect the Continental nameplate for this car. Ford has no excuse anymore not to put more money into the Lincoln brand and who cares about bargain luxury unless your buying  a Hyundai Genesis which will never have a shot at being a status symbol which many older Lincolns (way back) were.  If Ford builds a great Lincoln(s) customers will buy them regardless of the price, look at how much Cadillacs go for and they outsell Lincoln because right now because many of their cars have the complete package (look good, perform well, better quality)

oh I know why there is no Audi A6 4.2FSI it's the only "competitor" that will not come with RWD so it would have kicked MKS' ass bad.

I have to agree the whole thing is BS. Why test at 12000ft. Why compare  an AWD turbo car at 12k ft to 3 cars that are RWD and have no turbo ... this is ridiculous. I've just wasted a half hour watching a commercial.

why is there no Audi A6